The Senior Conservative

Mr. Bush and the Stemcell Decision

By Dick O'Connor

The reader will detect a certain amount of angst in this article. Nor only angst, but melancholy, pathos, depression, etc. It is not the usual style, but the subject demands such a sober tone. We are talking about stem cell research and human cloning. Have we come so far that we can now engineer our progeny? Is that what we want? More importantly, is that what God wants?

President Bush is mulling over the decision of whether or not to spend tax dollars to further research on stem cell technology. It must be emphasized that he is deciding whether to fund embryonic stem cell research, not adult stemcell research or placental stem cell research or umbilical cord stem cell research. No destruction of life is involved in the latter three types of research. It is a terrible decision to make. If he says that we should fund it, millions, perhaps billion of human embryos will start developing in the pathway of life only to be "harvested" at a certain point to be determined later. How much later? First trimester? Second? Or third? Or as needed (?) by the harvester in the marketplace?

On the other hand, there are those with spinal cord injuries (Christopher Reed) who could probably be helped (no guarantees!) by this research. There are many more paraplegics, hemiplegics etc. who cannot lead normal or productive lives. Perhaps even Alzheimers will respond to this type of therapy. Should we just say, " Sorry, we refuse to subsidize this possible cure for your condition." It seems that it would be immoral to create human life and then destroy it.

In the cloning sequence, somewhat different from stem cell research, a human egg extracted from a female, is evacuated of its DNA. It is then filled with DNA from the other parent and evolves as a clone of that parent that donor parent only. The principle of cross fertilization ( a type of reproduction of all higher plants and animals) is circumvented The egg is then stimulated by a small electrical charge (Shades of Frankenstein!) and begins to divide (mitosis) and later, specialized sex cell division (miosis). Human life exists at this point (fertilization) and if conditions are right, an embryo will develop. Now at what point do we harvest? The blastula stage which is a globe of ball consisting of at least 8 cells, or do we wait until the primitive neural groove has developed , the gastrula stage of at least 64 cells? In either case, aren't we destroying life?

The humanists among us will insist that it shouldn't be considered as murder if we are helping our handicapped citizens. The scientists who advocate this procedure say they need the embryonic stem cells for research in many forms of disease and disability. The people who want to clone humans are suspected of being a supply source of stem cells, due to the 98% failure rate in cloning as reported in other animals. Don't forget that we are still animals. Half angel, half animal. Will this new technology be enough to make us angels? Or will it make us entirely selfish animals who live forever? Who wants to live forever?

God help and counsel Mr. Bush in his decision. God help and counsel us to understand and accept Bush's decision.

(Editor's Note:  This column was submitted for publishing just hours BEFORE the press conference at which President Bush was scheduled to announce his decision on whether to pursue federal funding for embryonic stemcell research.)

http://www.888webtoday.com

Join WebToday's Mailing List!
Receive updates and
"inside information."
 
Subscribe Unsubscribe

Permission granted to publish or broadcast this article with attribution to WebToday.

©2000 WebToday

 

 


4.9¢ long distance from WebToday: Online sign-up takes 30 seconds